Published by: Kowsar

The Relation between Electrocardiogram Damage Rating and Hospitalization Outcome in Myocardial Infarction

Simindokht Moshar 1 , Mehrnoosh Broumandpour 1 , Maryam Mohsenikia 2 , * , Scott Reza Jafarian Kerman 3 , Sarvenaz Zavareie 4 , Seyyed Yasin Mousavi Vaezi 4 and Seyyed Mohammad Javad Mirlohi 4
Authors Information
1 Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Thrita: December 20, 2013, 2 (4); 52-5
  • Published Online: November 10, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 22, 2012
  • Revised: December 18, 2012
  • Accepted: December 22, 2012
  • DOI: 10.5812/thrita.7346

To Cite: Moshar S, Broumandpour M, Mohsenikia M, Jafarian Kerman S R, Zavareie S, et al. The Relation between Electrocardiogram Damage Rating and Hospitalization Outcome in Myocardial Infarction, Thrita. 2013 ;2(4):52-5. doi: 10.5812/thrita.7346.

Copyright © 2013, Thrita. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Selwyn AP, Braunwald E. HARRISONS PRINCIPLES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. 2005; 16: 1434
  • 2. Patil SS, Joshi R, Gupta G, Reddy MV, Pai M, Kalantri SP. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in a rural population of central India: a hospital-based case-control study. Natl Med J India. 2004; 17(4): 189-94[PubMed]
  • 3. Daviglus ML, Stamler J, Pirzada A, Yan LL, Garside DB, Liu K, et al. Favorable cardiovascular risk profile in young women and long-term risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2004; 292(13): 1588-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Mahjoub H, Rusinaru D, Souliere V, Durier C, Peltier M, Tribouilloy C. Long-term survival in patients older than 80 years hospitalised for heart failure. A 5-year prospective study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008; 10(1): 78-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Greenland P, Knoll MD, Stamler J, Neaton JD, Dyer AR, Garside DB, et al. Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2003; 290(7): 891-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Rahmanian K, Shojaie M. The prevalence of pre-hypertension and its association to established cardiovascular risk factors in south of Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2012; 5: 386[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Muller C. New ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012; 142[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(20): 2569-619[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Bergovec M, Prpic H, Mihatov S, Zigman M, Vukosavic D, Birtic K, et al. The value of the QRS scoring system in assessing regional and global left ventricular ejection fraction early after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14(8): 1102-9[PubMed]
  • 10. Richardson K, Engel G, Yamazaki T, Chun S, Froelicher VF. Electrocardiographic damage scores and cardiovascular mortality. Am Heart J. 2005; 149(3): 458-63[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Selvester RH, Collier CR, Pearson RB. Analog Computer Model of the Vectorcardiogram. Circulation. 1965; 31: 45-53[PubMed]
  • 12. van Domburg RT, Klootwijk P, Deckers JW, van Bergen PF, Jonker JJ, Simoons ML. The Cardiac Infarction Injury Score as a predictor for long-term mortality in survivors of a myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19(7): 1034-41[PubMed]
  • 13. Porela P, Luotolahti M, Helenius H, Pulkki K, Voipio-Pulkki LM. Automated electrocardiographic scores to estimate myocardial injury size during the course of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83(6): 949-52[PubMed]
  • 14. Chung EK. Comprehensive Electrocardiography: Theory and Practice in Health and Disease. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1989; 262(4): 571-571
  • 15. Hinohara T, Hindman NB, White RD, Ideker RE, Wagner GS. Quantitative QRS criteria for diagnosing and sizing myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53(6): 875-8[PubMed]
  • 16. Fioretti P, Tijssen JG, Azar AJ, Lazzeroni E, Brower RW, ten Katen HJ, et al. Prognostic value of predischarge 12 lead electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction compared with other routine clinical variables. Br Heart J. 1987; 57(4): 306-12[PubMed]
  • 17. Knippenberg SA, Wagner GS, Ubachs JF, Gorgels A, Hedstrom E, Arheden H, et al. Consideration of the impact of reperfusion therapy on the quantitative relationship between the Selvester QRS score and infarct size by cardiac MRI. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010; 15(3): 238-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Hatmi ZN, Tahvildari S, Gafarzadeh Motlag A, Sabouri Kashani A. Prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors in Iran: a population based survey. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007; 7: 32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Ideker RE, Wagner GS, Ruth WK, Alonso DR, Bishop SP, Bloor CM, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 49(7): 1604-14[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments